DENNIS WILLIAM KAMASINSKI, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DENNIS WILLIAM KAMASINSKI, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
953 So. 2d 19
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We have for review an appeal by the appellant, Dennis William Kamasinski, of the denial by the trial court of his motion for new trial addressed to his conviction by a jury of premeditated first degree murder in 1985. We affirm. First, Mr. Kamasin-ski’s motion was filed well beyond the ten-day limitation contained in rule 3.590(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Second, his motion was successive, and was properly denied on that ground, as well.
AFFIRMED.
GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Torres, 60 So. 3d 560 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…cipant in the incident); see also Knox v. State, 814 So. 2d 1185, 1187 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (holding that sixteen-year-old victim’s consent could be considered as basis to impose downward departure sentence based on holding in Rife); Holland v. State, 953 So. 2d 19, 21 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (holding child victim’s consent could be basis to impose downward departure sentence for nine counts of lewd or lascivious battery). A trial court can mitigate a sentence based on conduct that is not sufficient to excuse the…
-
Renaldo Champagne v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)