RICK BARNETT, ETC., ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, RESPONDENT
RICK BARNETT, ETC., ET AL., PETITIONERS,
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, RESPONDENT
953 So. 2d 461
Florida Supreme Court (2007)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 28 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We accepted jurisdiction to review Barnett v. Department of Management Services, 931 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), in which the First District Court of Appeal certified a question of great public importance. After further consideration, we conclude that we should exercise our discretion and decline review because the circumstances of this case are fact-specific. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
Vargas v. Enter. Leasing Co., 993 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)…, concur. KLEIN and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., recused. . Although we are not required to follow the Eleventh Circuit on questions of federal law, we find it to be persuasive on the preemption question presented in this case. See Carnival Corp. v. Carlisle, 953 So. 2d 461, 465 (Fla.2007); Pignato v. Great Western Bank, 664 So. 2d 1011, 1015 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). . Section 324.021(7), Florida Statutes (2007) contains a similar definition, with different monetary amounts. . The amounts of required insurance under the…
-
ST. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist. v. Coy A. Koontz, 77 So. 3d 1220 (Fla. 2011)…30] Amendment takings jurisprudence. See Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Martin, 283 U.S. 209, 220-21, 51 S.Ct. 453, 75 L.Ed. 983 (1931) (state courts are bound by United States Supreme Court’s interpretations of federal law); Carnival Corp. v. Carlisle, 953 So. 2d 461, 465 (Fla.2007) (state courts are generally not bound by the decisions of the lower federal courts on questions of federal law). Moreover, the Supreme Court itself has specifically stated that when it denies certiorari review, that denial “imports n…
-
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. COX, 137 So. 3d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)…time law governs in seaman cases brought in state court. See Norwegian Cruise Lines, Ltd. v. Zareno, 712 So. 2d 791, 793 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Doles v. Koden Int’l, Inc., 779 So. 2d 609, 611-12 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). See also Carnival Corp. v. Carlisle, 953 So. 2d 461, 464 (Fla.2007); Hall v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., 888 So. 2d 654, 654 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Hopkins v. The Boat Club, Inc., 866 So. 2d 108, 110-11 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). Federal maritime law follows the American Rule regarding attorney’s fee…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hill v. McDONOUGH, 931 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
- Barnett v. Dep't OF Mgmt. Servs., 931 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)