GEORGE E. HUFF, APPELLANT,

v.

UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Flores v. State, 57 So. 3d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
  …. A defendant’s sworn answers during a plea colloquy must mean something. A criminal defendant is bound by his sworn assertions and cannot rely on representations of counsel which are contrary to the advice given by the judge. See Scheele v. State, 953 So. 2d 782, 785 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (“A plea conference is not a meaningless charade to be manipulated willy-nilly after the fact; it is a formal ceremony, under oath, memorializing a crossroads in the case. What is said and done at a plea conference carries c…
• Nelfrard v. State, 34 So. 3d 221 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
  …t would serve. See, e.g., Alfred v. State, 998 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). Where the court informs a defendant of his sentencing exposure, a defendant may not reasonably rely on a contrary representation by counsel. See, e.g., Scheele v. State, 953 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (holding that a defendant could not reasonably rely on his lawyer’s alleged advice that he faced a maximum sentence of only ten years where the trial court told the defendant in no uncertain terms that he faced a maximum of twent…
• Gusow v. State, 6 So. 3d 699 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
  …r his 47 felonies and what his lawyer said he could receive for violating his probation, the defendant could not have reasonably relied on the lawyer’s supposed advice that he faced only five years for a violation of probation. See Scheele v. State, 953 So. 2d 782, 785 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Hill v. State, 895 So. 2d 1122, 1124 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); contra Medina v. State, 920 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Johnson v. State, 757 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). . We recognize that the Third District Court of Appe…