BRAYAN RIVERA, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ON BEHALF OF CAROLINA RIVERA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2007-04-25
No. 3D06-2146
Before WELLS, SHEPHERD, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.
954 So. 2d 723 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2007) Positive Treatment
Cited by 16 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the Department of Revenue’s, on behalf of Carolina Rivera, proper confession of error, we vacate the Final Administrative Support Order and remand to the lower tribunal for a new hearing before the Division of Administrative Hearings.

Final order vacated and case remanded with instructions.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (16 total)

  • City OF Boca Raton v. Basso, 242 So. 3d 1141 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)
    …"An appellate court reviews whether a trial court's award of costs is excessive for an abuse of discretion; however, whether a cost requested may be awarded, at all, is a question of law to be reviewed de novo." Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Reddick , 954 So. 2d 723, 730 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (internal citation omitted). Section 57.041(1), Florida Statutes (2016), provides that "[t]he party recovering judgment shall recover all his or her legal costs and charges which shall be included in the judgment." (Emphasi…
  • Zivitz v. Zivitz, 16 So. 3d 841 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
    …ts, and we review the court’s interpretation of the statutory language de novo. See Allen v. State, 873 So. 2d 576, 578 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (holding that questions of statutory interpretation are reviewed de novo); Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Reddick, 954 So. 2d 723, 726 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (holding that application of undisputed facts to statute is subject to de novo review); Cadle Co. v. Pegasus Ranch, Inc., 920 So. 2d 1276, 1277 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (holding that orders construing garnishment statute are revi…
  • Magdalena v. Toyota Motor Corp., 253 So. 3d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
    …s the issue before this Court involves the interpretation of a statute, which is a pure question of law, the standard of review is de novo. B.Y. v. Dep't of Children & Families, 887 So. 2d 1253, 1255 (Fla. 2004) ; Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Reddick, 954 So. 2d 723, 730 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) ("An appellate court reviews whether a trial court's award of costs is excessive for an abuse of discretion; however, whether a cost requested may be awarded, at all, is a question of law to be reviewed de novo.") (citation…

Previewing 3 of 16 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw