RICARDO BAILEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RICARDO BAILEY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
954 So. 2d 1264
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2007)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We agree that the trial court improperly sustained certain hearsay objections. However, such errors were harmless because the witness was later able to testify to those matters which had initially been wrongfully excluded. Wallace v. State, 766 So. 2d 364, 371-72 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); see also Turner v. State, 809 So. 2d 59, 62 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).
AFFIRMED.
PLEUS, C.J., ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Jackson v. Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 766 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)
- Wallace v. State, 766 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
- Carlton Turner v. State, 809 So. 2d 59 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)