JIMMY EUGENE COCHRAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JIMMY EUGENE COCHRAN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
954 So. 2d 1279
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Cochran contends the trial court erred by conducting his trial without holding a competency hearing after having invoked the procedure for determining competency under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.210. The State properly concedes error. Cochran v. State, 925 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). We vacate Cochran’s convictions and sentence. We remand for a competency determination and retrial if Cochran is found competent to proceed. Tingle v. State, 536 So. 2d 202 (Fla.1988).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
ORFINGER, MONACO and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Beebe v. Roman, 994 So. 2d 484 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)…n of not having enough money to sustain the lifestyle that they both enjoyed during the course of the marital relationship.” An award of alimony that results in the equalization of income is not per se improper. See, e.g., Sonnenfeld v. Sonnenfeld, 954 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007); Naugle v. Naugle, 682 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). An alimony award made after appropriately considering all of the factors set forth in section 61.08(2) will generally be upheld if the amount awarded is not arbitrary, fanci…
-
Rosier v. State, 38 So. 3d 856 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)…conducting a competency hearing as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.210 after a prior judge appointed a medical expert to evaluate Mr. Rosier’s competency to proceed to trial. The state properly concedes error. See Cochran v. State, 954 So. 2d 1279, 1279 (Fla. 5th DCA [*857] 2007). In relevant part, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.210(b) requires, If, at any material stage of a criminal proceeding, the court of its own motion, or on motion of counsel for the defendant or for the state, h…
Authorities Cited
- Tingle v. State, 536 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 1988)
- Cochran v. State, 925 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)