WANZA L. HARDY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WANZA L. HARDY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
955 So. 2d 1240
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Francis v. State, 808 So. 2d 110, 134 (Fla.2001); Ridley v. State, 407 So. 2d 1000, 1002 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).
PLEUS, C.J., GRIFFIN and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
S.M. v. Fla. Dep't OF Child. & Families, 202 So. 3d 769 (Fla. 2016)…is not the dispositive consideration under the least restrictive means test. See In re Z.C., 88 So. 3d 977 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); S.S. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 891 So. 2d 1068, 1070 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); R.L. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 955 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007); see also N.S. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 36 So. 3d 776, 779 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (holding that “[t]he existence of possible placement with a relative is irrelevant to the least [restrictive] means test, where DCF made reason…
-
In the Interest of Z.C.(1) & Z.C.(2) v. K.D. and Z.H., 88 So. 3d 977 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)…ervs., 891 So. 2d 1068, 1070 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (holding that the trial court properly rejected the parent’s argument that a long-term relative placement was the least restrictive means of protecting the child); R.L. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 955 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (“[T]he existence of a long-term relative placement is not the ‘dispositive constitutional consideration’ in applying the least-restrictive means test.”) (quoting A.J. v. K.A.O., 951 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)). Thus, the tria…
-
S.M. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 190 So. 3d 125 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)…is not the dispositive consideration under the least restrictive means test. See In re Z.C., 88 So. 3d 977 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); S.S. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 891 So. 2d 1068, 1070 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); R.L. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 955 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007); see also N.S. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 36 So. 3d 776, 779 (Fla. 3d DCA.2010).(holding that “[t]he existence of possible placement with a relative is irrelevant to.the least restrict means test, where,DCF made reasonable…
Authorities Cited
- Carlton A. Francis v. State, 808 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 2001)
- Ridley v. State, 407 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
- Jollie v. State, 407 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)