LAWRENCE TERRELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ALTENBERND, Judge.
Lawrence Terrell appeals a judgment for possession of cocaine, entered after the trial court denied Mr. Terrell’s dispositive motion to suppress. The cocaine was seized during a search incident to Mr. Terrell’s arrest. Although from the record it is a very close question whether the officers had probable cause to arrest Mr. Terrell for disorderly conduct, see Barry v. State, 934 So. 2d 656, 657-58 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006), the officers clearly had probable cause to arrest him for filing a false report, see § 817.49, Fla. Stat. (2005). We therefore affirm the judgment and sentence.
Affirmed.
WHATLEY and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smith v. Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 27 So. 3d 124 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)…hall be made enforceable by means of a civil restitution hen order.” § 960.292, Fla. Stat. The sentencing court has the authority to enter such orders on its own motion or upon motion by the state. § 960.292(1), Fla. Stat.; see also Wilson v. State, 957 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007); Cruz v. State, 742 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); City of Ft. Lauderdale v. Ilkanic, 683 So. 2d 563 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), approved, 705 So. 2d 1371 (Fla.1998). Alternatively, the state [*127] may seek recovery of the amounts prov…
-
Fla. Dep't of Corr. v. De La Paz, 388 So. 3d 4 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)…proceedings criminal. Rather, the criminal court’s authority to impose the civil restitution lien reflects the legislature’s intention to create an accelerated method of imposing a civil restitution judgment.” (citation omitted)); Wilson v. State, 957 So. 2d 683, 685–86 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (holding that the Act “does not violate substantive due process because it bears a reasonable relationship to the legislative objective of alleviating the financial burden on the State resulting from the costs of incarcer…
-
Guilder v. State, 89 So. 3d 1063 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)…nd in favor of the state or its local subdivisions. § 960.293(2)(a)-(b), Fla. Stat.1 The defendant insists the statute did not allow the trial court to impose a lien in favor of both the Sheriffs office and the State, relying upon Wilson v. State, 957 So. 2d 683, 684-85 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007), review denied, 83 So. 3d 711 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 2399, — L.E.2d- (2012). In Wilson, the trial court imposed “costs of incarceration of $50 daily and $250,000,” relying upon subsections (a) and (b) of…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Barry v. State, 934 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)