GORDON HALES, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
GORDON HALES, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
957 So. 2d 699
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
WELLS, J.
The dismissal of appellant’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is affirmed without prejudice to his filing an appropriate motion in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit. See Calloway v. State, 699 So. 2d 849, 850 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (observing that a circuit court has no jurisdiction to review the legality of a conviction in another circuit); Leichtman v. Singletary, 674 So. 2d 889, 891 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hales v. State, 260 So. 3d 413 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)…t Court was without jurisdiction to rule on the petition. Thus, the trial court should have dismissed Hales’ petition without prejudice to allow him to file an appropriate motion or petition in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit. See Hales v. State, 957 So. 2d 699, 699-70 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (affirming the dismissal of Hales’ petition for writ of habeas corpus as the Miami- Dade Circuit Court lacked jurisdiction to review the legality of Hales’ conviction entered in another county, without prejudice to allow…
-
Darcy L. Robinson v. State, 987 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…WELLS, Judge. The dismissal of appellant’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is affirmed without prejudice to his filing a post conviction motion, if appropriate, in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit. See Hales v. State, 957 So. 2d 699, 700 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Callo-way v. State, 699 So. 2d 849, 850 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (observing that a circuit court has no jurisdiction to review the legality of a conviction in another circuit); Leichtman v. Singletary, 674 So. 2d 889, 891 (Fla. 4t…
Authorities Cited
- Leichtman v. Singletary, 674 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
- Calloway v. State, 699 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)