DONALD G. FAIR, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
DONALD G. FAIR, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
958 So. 2d 483
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.
VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Hayes, 122 So. 3d 408 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)…he breach occurred and started the statute of limitations running; and 3) the plaintiffs failed to sufficiently address FP & L’s affirmative defenses. Standard of Review The standard of review of a summary judgment is de novo. Lopes v. Sappington, 958 So. 2d 483, 485 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). A trial court’s ruling on a motion for rehearing is reviewed for abuse of discretion, but where the motion is directed to a summary judgment, “the discretion not to grant is narrowed and every disposition should be indulged…
-
Patterson v. A LAW Off. OF Lauri J. Goldstein, P.A., 980 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)…lorida Supreme Court’s decision in Chandris, S.A. v. Yanakakis, 668 So. 2d 180 (Fla.1995), the trial court entered summary judgment in favor of Goldstein. The standard of review of an order granting summary judgment is de novo. Lopes v. Sappington, 958 So. 2d 483, 485-86 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). Summary judgment is improper unless the pleadings and evidence conclusively show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id. Because Goldstein…