JOHNNIE F. JETER, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• In the Interest of Z.C.(1) & Z.C.(2) v. K.D. and Z.H., 88 So. 3d 977 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)
  …adjudicatory hearing. Thus, the trial court’s order placing the children in a permanent guardianship had the effect of modifying the case plan without affording proper notice or the opportunity to be heard. See K.E. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 958 So. 2d 968, 972 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (holding that the trial court’s order granting the father’s motion for sole custody and to terminate jurisdiction had the effect of erroneously modifying the mother’s case plan without proper notice and the opportunity for a…
• In the Interest of E.G-S. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs. & Guardian Ad Litem Program, 113 So. 3d 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)
  …s., 946 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). But when the parent is diligently working on a reunification case plan, proceeding in that fashion effectively produces a de facto amendment of the reunification goal. See K.E. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 958 So. 2d 968, 971-72 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (citing R.H. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 948 So. 2d 898, 899-900 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)). Again, due process requires that a court determine the propriety of amending a case plan only after an evidentiary hearing. See F…
• A.L. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 53 So. 3d 324 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)
  …ess in the five months since the case plan had been adopted. Despite this progress and the [*328] plan’s stated completion date of June 16, 2010, the mother was not given until then to reach compliance. In K.E. v. Department of Children & Families, 958 So. 2d 968 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007), this Court held that an offending parent who has substantially complied with a case plan that has the goal of reunification is entitled to reunification with the dependent child absent a determination that reunification would be…

  ← 1 / 2 →