GERALD BERNARD HUMPHREY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of Appellant’s motion for posteonvietion relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. However, in our review of this matter, we note that although the appropriate minimum mandatory sentences were pronounced at the time of Appellant’s sentencing, the written sentencing documents as to counts 1, 4 and 5 failed to reflect that fact. Accordingly, we remand this matter to the trial court with directions that the sentencing documents be corrected to accurately reflect the minimum mandatory sentences orally pronounced. Because this is merely a clerical matter, Appellant need not be present.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
SAWAYA, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lamore v. State, 86 So. 3d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)…es.” Id. The State addressed Miller in its response and pointed out that, unlike La-more, Miller was designated a youthful offender upon his initial sentencing. The State argued that Lamore’s situation is more analogous to that of Adderly v. State, 958 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). In Adderly, the defendant, a minor, was sentenced on January 25, 2001, as an adult. Id. at 998. Only following a July 11, 2006, letter from the DOC recommending the defendant for boot camp was he designated as a youthful offende…
-
Reginald v. Davis, Jr., 16 So. 3d 995 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)…5)(c), Florida Statutes, to youthful offender originally sentenced under earlier version of statute upon revocation of probation following successful completion of boot camp, violated ex post facto clause of Constitution); see also Adderly v. State, 958 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007); Fettler v. State, 885 So. 2d 411, 412 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). On rehearing, the State now asserts that Appellant never completed the [*997] boot camp program and filed an affidavit from a Department of Corrections official in supp…
-
Negron v. State, 90 So. 3d 948 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)…a community residential program. If the offender violates the conditions of probation, the court may revoke probation and impose any sentence that it might have originally imposed as a condition of probation. (Emphasis added); see Adderly v. State, 958 So. 2d 997, 998 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (“Prior to this statutory change, a defendant who violated probation after completing boot camp could only be sentenced to 364 days in jail.”). Effective July 1, 2006, section 958.045(5)(c) was amended to permit a trial cou…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence