JAMES DAVID RITTER, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• The Est. OF Norma J. Johnson v. Badger Acquisition OF Tampa LLC, 983 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)
  …hout limitations. Generally, it is inapplicable where there is no physical harm or where an undertaker “was [not] engaged to perform a service reasonably expected to be relied upon by a stranger to the engagement.” Casamassina v. U.S. Life Ins. Co., 958 So. 2d 1093, 1102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (citing First Fla. Bank, N.A. v. Max Mitchell & Co., 558 So. 2d 9, 12 (Fla.1990)). Analyzing whether Omnicare had a duty under the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 324A rubric, we first consider whether the consultant pharm…
• Universal Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Jamon A. Johnson and Chaka Johnson, 114 So. 3d 1031 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)
  …, an application for insurance need not be intentional before recovery may be denied pursuant to 627.409.” Kieser v. Old Line Life Ins. Co. of Am., 712 So. 2d 1261, 1263 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Casamassina v. U.S. Life Ins. Co. in the City of New York, 958 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). In Gainsco v. ECS/Choicepoint Servs., Inc., 853 So. 2d 491, 493 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), this court explained that section 627.409(1) allows for the voiding of a policy “for misrepresentation or omission without regard to whether th…
• Hesham Moustafa and Hala Ahmed v. Omega Ins. Co., 201 So. 3d 710 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)
  …is rarely proper in ‘knowledge and belief' cases because the issue usually ‘turns on the axis of the circumstances surrounding the complete transaction, including circumstantial evidence of intent and knowledge.’ ” Casamassina v. U.S. Life Ins. Co., 958 So. 2d 1093, 1100-01 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (quoting Cohen v. Kravit Estate Buyers, Inc., 843 So. 2d 989, 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)). However, Homeowners did not preserve this issue for appellate review, and summary judgment was granted on other grounds in addition…