SILVIO MITSOULIS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2007-06-20
No. 3D07-1011
Before GERSTEN, FLETCHER, and SUAREZ, JJ.
959 So. 2d 414 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2007) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Stano v. State, 520 So. 2d 278 (Fla.1988).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Stough v. Laurel L. Stough, 18 So. 3d 601 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
    …ual distribution of the parties’ assets and remand with instructions that the marital assets be equally divided between the parties. PERMANENT PERIODIC ALIMONY A trial court has broad discretion in determining and awarding alimony. Smyth v. Smyth, 959 So. 2d 414, 415 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). The standard of review for alimony determinations is abuse of discretion. See Helling v. Bartok, 987 So. 2d 713, 715 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). [*606] Here, the trial court awarded the former husband $2,000 in permanent periodic…
  • Helling v. Bartok, 987 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)
    …t as an attorney, which the trial court found to have been in June of 2006. We review the amounts1 of the trial court’s alimony determinations for an abuse of discretion. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197, 1202 (Fla. 1980); Smyth v. Smyth, 959 So. 2d 414, 415 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). [*716] Although the former husband reported expenses which exceeded his net pay, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s decision that the former husband, whose gross pay amounts to $7,916.67 per month and who e…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw