CHARLES H. MCINTOSH, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD) does not apply to violation of probation (VOP) proceedings, and a defendant cannot force a court to timely dispose of a VOP.
Petitioner sought speedy disposition of a VOP affidavit while serving a federal sentence, without alleging a VOP warrant had been served. The trial co…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Interstate Agreement On Detainers cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner filed a notice of appeal from a trial court order that denied his motion for speedy disposition of his Florida violation of probation (VOP) affidavit. The trial court’s order is non-final and non-appeal-able.
We have redesignated this case as a petition for writ of prohibition and treated petitioner’s initial brief as his petition. Weyburn v. State, 763 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Subervi v. Miller, 555 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).
Petitioner is currently serving a federal prison sentence, and he has not alleged that a VOP warrant has been served on him. The trial court properly denied petitioner’s motion because the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD) does not apply to VOP proceedings. Carchman v. Nash, 473 U.S. 716, 105 S.Ct. 3401, 87 L.Ed.2d 516 (1985).
We deny the petition for writ of prohibition. See Saunders v. State, 837 So. 2d 433 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (denying prohibition and noting that no mechanism exists where a defendant can force a court to timely dispose of a VOP, and the failure to do so does not deprive the court of jurisdiction); see also Burgess v. State, 913 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (affirming the trial court’s dismissal of the motion to compel speedy disposition of VOP detainer).
STEVENSON, C.J., SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Graham v. State, 990 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)…PER CURIAM. Petitioner seeks a belated appeal of an order denying her motion requesting final disposition of a pending violation of probation proceeding. An order denying such a request is nonfinal and nonappealable. See McIntosh v. State, 959 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). Accordingly, the petition seeking belated appeal is denied. BARFIELD, ALLEN, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.…
-
Berry v. State, 993 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)…PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See McIntosh v. State, 959 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b). BROWNING, C.J., WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.…
-
Andreoli v. State, 111 So. 3d 954 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See McIntosh v. State, 959 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Irby v. Missouri, 427 So. 2d 367 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). ORFINGER, C.J., EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Carchman v. Nash, 473 U.S. 716 (U.S. 1985)
- Saunders v. State, 837 So. 2d 433 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
- Smothers v. State, 555 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)
- Elliott R. Subervi v. Hon. Jeffords D. Miller, 555 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)
- Burgess v. State, 913 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
- Palilla v. State, 763 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)