JONES, ET AL
v.
COLEY, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A minor pedestrian sued defendants for negligent operation of motor vehicles that struck her. The court rejected defendants' motion to dismiss, holding that Florida's no-fault motor vehicle insurance statute (§627.737) violates due process when applied to pedestrians to bar full damages recovery.
The application of §627.737 to a pedestrian to prohibit full damages recovery violates the due process guarantees of both the Florida and United States Constitutions, as well as sections 21 and 22 of Article I of the Florida Constitution.
“the application of §627.737, Florida Statutes, to a pedestrian such as plaintiff so as to prohibit such a plaintiff from suing to recover full damages for injuries suffered as a result of being struck by a motor vehicle constitutes a denial of due process of law guaranteed by the constitutions of the state of Florida and of the United States”
The court's holding establishing that the no-fault statute violates constitutional due process when applied to pedestrians
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGeraldine Jones, a minor, was struck by a motor vehicle driven by defendant Delorais Gooden Hill, which was allegedly negligently operated by the defe…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Due Process Of Law cases and more on FLexlaw
The plaintiff Geraldine Jones, a minor, suing by her mother and next friend, Elvira Beatrice Jones, filed suit alleging that the defendants herein negligently operated their vehicles so as to cause a motor vehicle driven by defendant Delorais Gooden Hill to strike Geraldine Jones, who was a pedestrian, and cause her injury. Plaintiff also alleges that “neither the plaintiff Geraldine Jones nor any member of her household owned a motor vehicle nor was she or any member of her household insured under any motor vehicle liability policy.”
The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint upon the grounds that the complaint failed to state a cause of action and the court lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, and moved to strike paragraph eight of the complaint in which plaintiff alleged that Florida Statutes, §627.737, the Florida Reparations Reform Act, is unconstitutional insofar at it may prohibit the plaintiff herein from suing to recover full damages.
After due notice, and the court having heard and considered argument of counsel, the court finds that the application of §627.737, Florida Statutes, to a pedestrian such as plaintiff so as to prohibit such a plaintiff from suing to recover full damages for injuries suffered as a result of being struck by a motor vehicle constitutes a denial of due process of law guaranteed by the constitutions of the state of Florida and of the United States and violates §§21 and 22 of article I of the constitution of the state of Florida.
It is therefore ordered that the defendants’ motions to dismiss and strike directed to the complaint herein are denied, and the defendants shall have ten days within which to file answers to the complaint.