FLORENCE MILLER, APPELLANT,
v.
GEORGE JOSEPH MILLER, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to he heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the Rules of this Court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from he, and the same is,, hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
HOBSON, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., and CARROLL, District Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (41 total)
-
Houston v. Caldwell, 359 So. 2d 858 (Fla. 1978)…rcised under the statute, then the election still remains his and not one which can be dictated by the defendant. Doonan v. Poole, Fla.App. 1959, 114 So. 2d 504. See Santa Rosa County v. Trobuck, 77 Fla. 86, 80 So. 748; Enfinger v. Baxley, Fla.1957, 96 So. 2d 538; Peterson v. Kirk, Fla.App.1958, 103 So. 2d 656. To hold otherwise would be to nullify the venue statute which gives the plaintiff the right to file his action in a particular place under certain specified conditions, (footnotes omitted) 124 So. 2d…
-
Atl. Coast Line R.R. Co. v. Ganey, 125 So. 2d 576 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960)…ter 46, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.] then the election still remains his and not one which can be dictated by the defendant. Doonan v. Poole, Fla.App.1959, 114 So. 2d 504. See Santa Rosa County v. Trobuck, 77 Fla. 86, 80 So. 748; Enfinger v. Baxley, Fla.1957, 96 So. 2d 538; Peterson v. Kirk, Fla.App.1958, 103 So. 2d 656. To hold otherwise would be to nullify the venue statute which gives the plaintiff the right to file his action in a particular place under certain specified conditions.” Concerning the second point r…
-
Greyhound Corp. v. Rosart, 124 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960)…rcised under the statute,2 then the election still remains his and not one which can be dictated by the defendant. Doonan v. Poole, Fla.App.1959, 114 So. 2d 504. See Santa Rosa County v. Trobuck, 77 Fla. 86, 80 So. 748; Enfinger v. Baxley, Fla.1957, 96 So. 2d 538; Peterson v. Kirk, Fla.App.1958, 103 So. 2d 656. To hold otherwise would be to nullify the venue statute which gives the plaintiff the right to file his action in a particular place under certain specified conditions. In light of the views expresse…
Previewing 3 of 41 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence