JAMES CANNON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JAMES CANNON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
961 So. 2d 991
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
See Leeman v. State, 357 So. 2d 703, 705 (Fla.1978) (reiterating that an offense must be charged “in the very language of the statute, or in language of equivalent import”).
AFFIRMED.
PLEUS, C.J., ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
A.L.M. v. State, 36 So. 3d 877 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)…ed certain court costs and a $300 public defender’s fee. On appeal, A.L.M. correctly contends that the imposition of the public defender’s fee was improper because he was not given notice of his right to contest the amount of the fee. J.F. v. State, 961 So. 2d 991 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). On remand, the fee obligation may be re-imposed, provided the trial court complies with the provisions of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d). J.F. AL.M.’s additional argument that a public defender’s lien may not be…
Authorities Cited
- Leeman v. State, 357 So. 2d 703 (Fla. 1978)