DONALD STEPHENS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DONALD STEPHENS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
961 So. 2d 1004
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. State v. White, 891 So. 2d 502 (Fla.2004); Westerheide v. State, 831 So. 2d 93 (Fla.2002); Roeling v. State, 880 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).
BARFIELD, KAHN, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bd. OF Trs. OF the Internal Improvement Tr. Fund v. Am. Educ. Enters., LLC, 99 So. 3d 450 (Fla. 2012)…6] opinion of the Third District evidences that the appellate court concluded that American satisfied the standard of irreparable harm ipso facto by analogizing this case to another Third District case, Redland Company, Inc. v. Atlantic Civil, Inc., 961 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). The Board, however, disagrees, and contends that the decision of the Third District should be quashed because the actual opinion and decision, which does not discuss irreparable harm, demonstrates that the court did not apply the…1 / 2
-
Carter v. Kerrie S. Carter, 3 So. 3d 397 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)…ending action, it may cause irreparable harm to a person who is forced to disclose it when the information is not relevant, Friedman v. Heart Inst. of Port St. Lucie, Inc., 863 So. 2d 189 (Fla.2003), or is overbroad, Redland Co. v. Atl. Civil, Inc., 961 So. 2d 1004, 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Under the circumstances of this case, we agree with the husband’s position that he should not be compelled to produce the discovery requested by the wife unless and until the court first determines the validity of the part…
-
Am. Educ. Enters., LLC v. Bd. OF Trs. OF the Internal Improvement Tr. Fund, 45 So. 3d 941 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)…very erroneous discovery order creates certiorari jurisdiction, certiorari is the proper remedy for overbroad discovery orders ‘because once discovery is wrongfully granted, the complaining party is beyond relief.’ ” Redland Co. v. Atl. Civil, Inc., 961 So. 2d 1004, 1006 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (quoting Caterpillar Indus., Inc. v. Keskes, 639 So. 2d 1129, 1129 n. 1 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)); Caribbean Sec. Sys., Inc. v. Sec. Control Sys., Inc., 486 So. 2d 654, 655 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); see also Stihl Se., Inc. v. Green Th…
Authorities Cited
- Westerheide v. State, 831 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 2002)
- State v. White, 891 So. 2d 502 (Fla. 2004)
- Rolon v. State, 880 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)