CALVIN LANIER FARMER, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Alton Roosevelt v. State, 42 So. 3d 293 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
  …amination question.3 As an alternative argument, the State contends that even if the impeachment evidence was improperly admitted, it constituted harmless error. We disagree. The error was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. See Pesci v. State, 963 So. 2d 780, 788 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (applying the “harmless beyond a reasonable doubt” standard in a proceeding pursuant [*298] to the Jimmy Ryce Act); Hoo v. State, 969 So. 2d 411, 412 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Finally, we address the defendant’s claim that he was…
• Washington v. State, 973 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)
  …commitment. Affirmed. . To reach our result, we need not decide whether the court’s ruling on unavailability was necessary. See Masters v. State, 958 So. 2d 973, 976 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007), and the majority and concurring opinions in Pesci v. State, 963 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).…
• Rubin Delgado v. State, 125 So. 3d 180 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)
  …e state improperly relied upon the 1988 battery conviction and the charge underlying the 2000 acquittal to show that he was a sexually violent predator. We review the court’s admission of this evidence for an abuse of discretion. See Pesci v. State, 963 So. 2d 780, 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (“A trial court’s ruling on the admissibility of evidence [in a Jimmy Ryce Act trial] will not be disturbed absent a finding that the trial court abused its discretion.”). Section 394.9155(5), Florida Statutes (2006), provid…