VERLINDA JOHNSON, APPELLANT,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Gonzalez v. State, 15 So. 3d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
  …otion to dismiss filed under § 916.303, Fla. Stat.). To obtain common law certiorari relief, a petitioner must show that there has been a departure from the essential requirements of law that causes material and irreparable harm. Reynolds v. State, 963 So. 2d 908, 909 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). The elements of material harm and the absence of a remedy on appeal are jurisdictional requirements for certiorari relief. Id. at 910. We conclude that Gonzalez has carried his burden as to these elements. See Vasquez, 496 S…
• Nucci v. Kathryn "Kate" Nucci, 987 So. 2d 135 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)
  …has demonstrated his entitlement to certiorari relief. A writ of certiorari is warranted when there has been a departure from the essential requirements of law, causing material harm that cannot be remedied on appeal. See, e.g., Reynolds v. State, 963 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Peters, 611 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). A failure to apply the correct standard for deciding a particular issue is a departure from the essential requirements of law. Dusseau v. Metro. Dade Co…
• McCray v. State, 230 So. 3d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)
  …ate, 15 So. 3d 37, 39 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (“To obtain common law certiorari relief, ‘a petitioner must show that there has been a departure from the essential requirements of law that causes material and. irreparable harm.” (citing Reynolds v. State, 963 So. 2d 908, 909 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007))). We granted in part and denied in part Petition I. McCray, 200 So. 3d at 1296-97. Specifically, we quashed the portion of the order continuing Mr. McCray’s conditional release. We reasoned that because he “did not qualify…