STANLEY E. MILES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Conclusively Refuted By The Record cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Stanley E. Miles, challenges the trial court’s summary denial of his eleven claims of ineffective assistance of counsel brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We find no error with the trial court’s summary denial of claims one through seven and claims nine through eleven. However, the record attachments do not conclusively refute claim eight. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order as to the summary denial of claim eight and remand with instructions to either attach portions of the record that conclusively refute the claim or conduct an evidentiary hearing. See Peede v. State, 748 So. 2d 253, 257 (Fla.1999) (explaining that the summary denial of a rule 3.850 claim may be upheld only if a claim is facially invalid or conclusively refuted by the record).
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings.
BARFIELD, DAVIS, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smith v. State, 69 So. 3d 1034 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)…mith had sexually molested the victim that day or the prior week. Thus, because claim I was not refuted by the attachments to the trial court’s order, we reverse the summary denial of claim I and remand for further proceedings. See Miles v. State, 964 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (reversing and remanding summary denial of postconviction claim where record attachments did not conclusively refute claim). On remand, the trial court should either attach the portion of the record that conclusively refutes Smit…
-
Thill v. McNEIL, 996 So. 2d 953 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)…nt’s calculation of gain time credits. Because official records indicate, and the State has confirmed, that Mr. Thill was released from prison during the pen-dency of this appeal, we dismiss the appeal as moot. See Doty v. Fla. Dep’t of Corrections, 964 So. 2d 258, 258-59 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Moore v. Moore, 764 So. 2d 676, 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (“A petition that goes to the length of confinement, rather than [*954] to the fact of confinement, is mooted by the inmate’s release.”). DISMISSED. KAHN, WEBST…
Authorities Cited
- Peede v. State, 748 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 1999)