YOVALL AUGOSHE, APPELLANT,
v.
DEBRA LEHMAN, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2007-09-19
No. 2D06-181
CASANUEVA, DAVIS, and CANADY, JJ., Concur.
964 So. 2d 277 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2007) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Yovall Augoshe, the husband, appeals an order awarding Debra Lehman, the wife, attorneys’ fees, suit. money, and costs stemming from the parties’ dissolution of marriage and awarding temporary attorneys’ fees, suit money, and costs for the appeal of the dissolution judgment.

In Augoshe v. Lehman, 962 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007), we reversed one portion of the amended final judgment of dissolution and remanded with instructions to the trial court to modify the equitable distribution plan. In light of that decision, we reverse the awards of attorneys’ fees, suit money, and costs and temporary attorneys’ fees, suit money, and costs. On remand, after the equitable distribution plan has been modified, the trial court shall reexamine the awards in view of the modified equitable distribution plan and other pertinent factors under section 61.16, Florida Statutes (2004).

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

CASANUEVA, DAVIS, and CANADY, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Vollmer v. Vollmer, 33 So. 3d 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
    …, recalculate its modification of child support. See § 61.14(1); Hudson-McCann v. McCann, 8 So. 3d 1228, 1230 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). Similarly, the trial court must reexamine the former wife’s award of attorney’s fees and costs. See Augoshe v. Lehman, 964 So. 2d 277, 277 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); see also Huntley v. Huntley, 578 So. 2d 890, 893 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (“Reconsideration of the parties’ incomes will also require reconsideration of each party’s ability to pay attorney’s fees.”). Reversed in part, affirmed…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw