ERNEST FLOWERS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2007-07-18
No. 3D07-1419
Before GERSTEN, C.J., and FLETCHER, and SUAREZ, JJ.
964 So. 2d 721 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2007) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Ernest Flowers (“Flowers”), seeks certiorari review of the trial court’s order summarily denying his Rule 3.850 Motion for Post-conviction relief. We treat Flowers’ petition as a notice of appeal and affirm. Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Flowers v. State, 190 So. 3d 1085 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)
    …[*1086] I.Facts Flowers has filed "at least fifteen (15) motions and various petitions in this Court. This Court denied the petitions and motions with .the exception of Flowers’ motions to withdraw or amend various pleadings. See Flowers v. State, 964 So. 2d 721 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Flowers v. State, 49 So. 3d 252 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Flowers v. State, 103 So. 3d 165 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Flowers v. State, 28 So. 3d 55 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Flowers v. State, 2014 WL 2624980 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014). Flowers first file…
    1 / 2

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw