DWAYNE KEITH HEAD, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Timeliness Of Petition cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Dwayne Keith Head complains that he was deprived of the effective assistance of appellate counsel in the course of a post-conviction appeal docketed before this court as case number 1D03-5073. Inasmuch as mandate in that appeal issued more than two years ago, Head’s petition is untimely under rule 9.141(c)(4)(B). More to the point, although it appears that Head is claiming he was deprived of the services of appellate counsel despite an order of the trial court appointing counsel for purposes of the appeal, this court’s records reflect that in fact appointed counsel did appear on petitioner’s behalf in the prior appeal. Accordingly, we conclude that even if Head’s claim were not procedurally barred, it nonetheless is without any factual support.
PETITION DENIED.
BROWNING, C.J., PADOVANO and THOMAS, JJ., concur. •
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wells v. Halmac Dev., Inc., 184 So. 3d 620 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)…t, like all other sums awarded, merges into the final judgment and accrues post-judgment interest in: accordance with section 55.03, Florida Statutes (2013). See Quality Engineered Installation, 670 So. 2d at 930; Westport Recovery Corp. v. Batista, 965 So. 2d 1189, 1190 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Therefore, because we find that prejudgment interest was not accounted for in the- Appellate Fee Judgment, the total sum due was inaccurate, and thus the determined amount of post-judgment interest was insufficient. “The am…