TYRONE ANTHONY BREAUX, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a conceded scoresheet error was harmless because the trial court would have imposed the same sentence regardless of the error.
The appellant pleaded guilty to several sex offenses and child abuse charges, receiving probation. After violating probation, he was sentenced to impr…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Error cases and more on FLexlaw
GALLEN, THOMAS M., Associate Senior Judge.
Tyrone Anthony Breaux appeals his judgments and sentences, arguing that an error in his scoresheet requires resentencing. We affirm.
Breaux was charged with offenses including capital sexual battery. In February 2002, he pleaded to one count of attempted sexual battery, two counts of handling and fondling a child under the age of sixteen, and one count of child abuse. He received a sentence of ten years’ sex offender probation.
Breaux violated his probation in 2006. He was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. Because we reject his argument that the trial court improperly included sexual contact points for the three sexual offenses, the error in his scoresheet totals only 10.5 points, which is conceded by the State. We are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the trial court would have imposed the same sentence with or without the 10.5 points. See State v. Anderson, 905 So. 2d 111 (Fla.2005).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgments and sentences on appeal.
Affirmed.
ALTENBERND and DAVIS, JJ„ Concur.