PATRICK WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Patrick Williams challenged his probation violation sentence as illegal under the Jessica Lunsford Act, arguing the Act's application was unconstitutional. The court affirmed the sentence as lawful but remanded to delete references to the Act from sentencing documents because Williams could not be designated a sexual predator under the Act since the Act post-dated his original convictions.
The sentence imposed was lawful and the judgment is affirmed. However, the case is remanded for deletion of references to the Jessica Lunsford Act from the sentencing documents because Williams cannot be designated a sexual predator under that Act, which only applies to designated sexual predators and became effective after his original 1992 convictions.
[1] A defendant cannot be sentenced under a statute that was not in effect at the time of their conviction.
[2] A defendant cannot be designated a sexual predator under a statute that was not in effect at the time of their conviction.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The Act became effective September 1, 2005, and established, among other things, increased registration and reporting requirements for probationers who are designated sexual predators, as defined by the Florida Sexual Predators Act, section 775.21, Florida Statutes (1993). The Florida Sexual Predators Act took effect after Williams' convictions in this case.”
Establishes the temporal problem: the sexual predator statute post-dates Williams' convictions
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceWilliams was convicted in 1992 of four counts of attempted sexual battery and one count of lewd and lascivious conduct involving a victim under twelve…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Sexual Predators Act cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders
appeal Patrick Williams challenges the judgment and sentence imposed following his guilty plea to a violation of probation. After sentencing, Williams filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2), contending that sentencing him under the Jessica Lunsford Act2 (“the Act”) was unconstitutional and therefore illegal. We affirm his judgment and sentence, but we remand for deletion of certain language in the sentencing documents.
Williams was adjudicated guilty on September 2, 1992, after pleading guilty to four counts of attempted sexual battery and one count of committing a lewd and lascivious act, all involving a victim less than twelve years of age. He was sentenced to thirty years in prison for each of the sexual battery counts, suspended after twenty-five years and followed by five years of probation. For the other count, he was sentenced to fifteen years in prison, suspended after ten years and followed by five years of probation. All prison sentences were to be served concurrently.
Williams was released in 2002 after serving only ten years. On May 22, 2006, he pleaded guilty to a probation violation, and the trial court revoked the probation and sentenced him to terms of twenty years each for the four counts of attempted sexual battery and fifteen years for the lewd and lascivious act, all time to be served concurrently. He was given credit for time served, and the sentence did not include probation. The sentence was lawful. Crews v. State, 779 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
The sentencing documents provided that Williams was sentenced under the Act. The Act became effective September 1, 2005, and established, among other things, increased registration and reporting requirements for probationers who are designated sexual predators, as defined by the Florida Sexual Predators Act, section 775.21, Florida Statutes (1993). The Florida Sexual Predators Act took effect after Williams’ convictions in this case. See Ch. 93-277, § 1, Laws of Fla. Williams therefore cannot be a designated sexual predator under that section since it was nonexistent at the time he was convicted in 1992. Therrien v. State, 914 So. 2d 942 (Fla.2005). Since Williams cannot be designated a sexual predator and the Act only applies to someone who is designated as a sexual predator, he cannot be sentenced “under” the Act, and the reference to the Act in the sentencing documents should be stricken.
We therefore remand this matter to the trial court for deletion of any reference to the Jessica Lunsford Act. We affirm in all other respects.
Affirmed and remanded with instructions.
DAVIS and VILLANTI, JJ., and THREADGILL, EDWARD F, Senior Judge, Concur. . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
. Chapter 2005-28, Laws of Fla.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Moss v. Moss, 914 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 2005)
- Crews v. State, 779 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
- Hunter v. State, 779 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
- Therrien v. State, 914 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 2005)