STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
ANTONIO MANCHADO, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2007-11-21
No. 4D07-30
GUNTHER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
968 So. 2d 115 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2007)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The State appeals the dismissal of felony driving while license revoked charges against Manchado, who operated a gas-powered mini motorcycle. The court reverses, holding that the motorcycle qualifies as a motor vehicle requiring a driver's license under Florida law, regardless of its engine displacement or top speed limitations.


Holding

The motorcycle qualifies as a motor vehicle under Florida Statutes section 322.01(26) and therefore a valid driver's license was required to operate it. The vehicle does not fall within the statutory exceptions for motorized bicycles or other excluded categories.


Headnotes

[1] A person may not drive any motor vehicle upon a highway in this state unless such person has a valid driver’s license.

[2] A "motor vehicle" is defined as any self-propelled vehicle not operated upon rails or guideway, excluding vehicles moved solely by human power, motorized wheelchairs, and…

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“any self-propelled vehicle, including a motor vehicle combination, not operated upon rails or guideway, excluding vehicles moved solely by human power, motorized wheelchairs, and motorized bicycles as defined in s. 316.003”

The statutory definition of motor vehicle under section 322.01(26) that the court applied to determine the mini motorcycle was a motor vehicle requiring a license

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Manchado was stopped by law enforcement for operating a gas-powered mini motorcycle with no license tag. The motorcycle had an engine displacement not…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
WARNER, J.

WARNER, J.

The state appeals an order of dismissal under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(c)(4) of the charge of felony driving while license revoked as a habitual offender in violation of section 322.34(5), Florida Statutes. The charge arose when appel-lee, Antonio Manchado, was stopped by law enforcement for operating a gas powered mini motorcycle with no license tag. He claimed that a driver’s license was not required to drive the motorcycle. We reverse, because the motorcycle came within the definition of a motor vehicle and required a license to operate'.

Manchado claimed that the mini pocket motorcycle had “an engine displacement that does not exceed 50 cubic centimeters” and “a top speed that does not exceed 30 miles per hours on level ground.” Thus, it was not a motor vehicle within the meaning of section 322.01, and he was riot required to have a driver’s license while operating it. The state filed a motion to strike and/or traverse contesting the motion to dismiss on several grounds, including Manchado’s claim that the motorcycle was not a motor vehicle and that a driver’s license was not required to operate it.

This issue may be resolved simply by referring to the statutes, as they are not ambiguous. See Soto v. State, 711 So. 2d 1275 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Section 322.03(1) states, “[Ejxcept as otherwise authorized in this chapter, a person may not drive any motor vehicle upon a highway in this state unless such person has a valid driver’s license under the provisions of this chapter.” Section 322.01(26) defines a “motor vehicle” as “any self-propelled vehicle, including a motor vehicle combination, not operated upon rails or guideway, excluding vehicles moved solely by human power, motorized wheelchairs, and motorized bicycles as defined in s. 316.003.” A motorized bicycle is defined, in part, as a vehicle not capable of exceeding a speed of twenty miles per hour. § 316.003(2), Fla. Stat. A motorcycle is defined, in part, as “a motor vehicle powered by a motor with a displacement of more than 50 cubic centimeters.... ” § 322.01(25), Fla. Stat. The vehicle at issue falls within the definition of a motor vehicle in chapter 322 as it is self-propelled, not operated upon rails or guideway, and does not fall within any of the éxclusions as it is not moved solely by human power nor is it a motorized wheelchair. § 322.01(26), Fla. Stat. Man-chado did not allege that the vehicle fell within the exception for motorized bicycles. A motorized bicycle by definition is not capable of exceeding a speed of twenty miles per hour, whereas here it was alleged that the vehicle could not exceed thirty miles per hour. § 316.003(2), Fla. Stat. Because the vehicle is self-propelled and not excluded from the definition of a motor vehicle, Manchado was required to have a license in order to operate it. The court erred in granting the motion to dismiss.

Reversed.

GUNTHER and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw