BRIAN M. KNOWLES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
BRIAN M. KNOWLES, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
968 So. 2d 623
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s order that denied appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion as successive, but echo the trial court’s warning to appellant that his continual filing of proeedurally barred or otherwise non-meritorious claims will result in proceedings to determine appropriate sanctions. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla.1999).
GUNTHER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gonzalez v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 80 So. 3d 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)…und was alleged entitling Espi-nosa to an evidentiary hearing on the issue of timeliness); accord Madueno v. Home Enter. Design, 18 So. 3d 1257 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (Cope, Suarez, and Salter, JJ.); accord Ambrister v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 968 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 3d DCA [*343] 2007) (Gersten, C.J., Cope, and Salter, JJ.); accord Banos-Hill v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 967 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Molina v. Home Depot USA, Inc., 941 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (affirming dismissal of app…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999)