VLADIMIR REYNA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2007-11-02
No. 5D07-2731
PALMER, C.J., MONACO and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
969 So. 2d 1100 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2007)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a motion for post-conviction relief cannot be summarily denied without attaching relevant records, and an evidentiary hearing is required for claims of coerced plea absent such records.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant sought post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, including a coerced plea. The trial court summarily denied the mot…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Vladimir Reyna, seeks review of the trial court’s summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court summarily denied the motion without attaching docu ments establishing that Mr. Reyna is not entitled to the relief that he seeks.

Mr. Reyna alleged ineffective assistance of counsel based on several purported errors or omissions of his attorney. We conclude that the trial court’s denial should be affirmed as to all grounds except for Mr. Reyna’s assertion that his plea was coerced.

A motion for post conviction relief should not be summarily denied without an evidentiary hearing unless the motion and records conclusively show that the movant is entitled to no relief. See Turner v. State, 570 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).. The trial court did not attach the plea colloquy or other documents that might have established that appellant’s plea was entered voluntarily and knowingly. Absent such record attachments, an evidentiary hearing is required on a claim of coercion. See Siegel v. State, 586 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

Accordingly, the order of the trial court is affirmed as to all grounds except the allegation that Mr. Reyna’s plea was coerced. As to that ground, this cause is remanded with instructions that the trial court either hold an evidentiary hearing on the voluntariness of Mr. Reyna’s plea, or attach portions of the record that support the denial of relief.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

PALMER, C.J., MONACO and LAWSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw