RAYMOND R. WATERS, APPELLANT,
v.
GENERAL SHEET METAL & ROOFING, INC., A CORPORATION; AND RALPH PERRY, APPELLEES
RAYMOND R. WATERS, APPELLANT,
GENERAL SHEET METAL & ROOFING, INC., A CORPORATION; AND RALPH PERRY, APPELLEES
97 So. 2d 17
Florida Supreme Court (1957)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed, under the authority of Younger v. Giller Contracting Co., 143 Fla. 335, 196 So. 690, and Miami Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Kindt, Fla., 48 So. 2d 840.
THOMAS, Acting Chief Justice, and HOBSON, ROBERTS, DREW, THOR-NAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., and ALLEN, District Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rhoades v. Bohn, 114 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959)…thin the jurisdiction of the Florida court. If the Florida court had had jurisdiction of either, then it would have had the power to act. Absent jurisdiction of either of these individuals the power to adjudicate the matter of custody was lacking.” [97 So. 2d 17.] The [*499] clear holding of the opinion is that had the trial court acquired jurisdiction over the custodian grandparents in the supplementary proceedings by proper service of process or notice, then it could have proceeded to adjudicate the custo…
-
Gross v. Rudy's Stone Co., Inc., 179 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)…Fla.App. 2, 1961, 132 So. 2d 613; Slack v. Acousti Engineering Company of Florida, Fla.App. 2, 1960, 122 So. 2d 574; Smith v. Poston Equipment Rentals, Inc., Fla.App. 3, 1958, 105 So. 2d 578; Waters v. General Sheet Metal & Roofing, Inc., Fla.1957, 97 So. 2d 17. The appellant seeks to escape from the rulings made in these cases by showing that he made no claim for compensation from his employer. We think that has nothing to do with the issue at all. The question is — Did he have a right to make a claim fo…
Authorities Cited
- Younger v. Giller Contracting Co., Inc., 143 Fla. 335 (Fla. 1940)
- Miami Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Kindt, 48 So. 2d 840 (Fla. 1950)