ETHEL LITT, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF LIZZIE LITT, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
RALPH JARSON AND HELEN JARSON, APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
The summary final judgment for the defendant appealed from was entered at pretrial conference upon the express ground that the doctrine of res judicata applied to all of the issues raised in this case. The issues presented by the appellant for review here were either tried and determined, or opportunity for such trial was afforded in cause No. 64648, in the Civil Court of Record in and for Dade County, Florida. This latter cause was regularly appealed and affirmed. There must be an end to litigation. Mattair v. Card, 19 Fla. 455; Hay v. Salisbury, 92 Fla. 446, 109 So. 617.
Affirmed.
CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
del Vecchio v. del Vecchio, 179 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)…upon the principle of res adjudicata was eminently correct, and the decree here under review is hereby affirmed on the authority of: Hay v. Salisbury, 92 Fla. 446, 109 So. 617; Wolfson v. Rubin, Fla.1951, 52 So. 2d 344; Litt v. Jarson, Fla.App.1957, 97 So. 2d 46; Stadler v. Cherry Hill Developers, Inc., Fla.App.1963, 150 So. 2d 468; 19 Fla.Jur., Judgments and Decrees, § 120. Affirmed.…
-
Super Serv. Prods. Corp. v. N. Store Corp., 214 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)…ece of property, arising out of the same negotiations, and I would hold the instant action to be barred upon the plea of res judicata and would affirm the summary final judgment adverse to the appellant as to count one. Litt v. Jarson, Fla.App.1957, 97 So. 2d 46; Stadler v. Cherry Hill Developers, Inc., Fla.App.1963, 150 So. 2d 468; Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, Fla.App.1965, 179 So. 2d 400; 19 Fla.Jur., Judgments and Decrees, § 120.…
-
Paul & Ellen Thomson v. State, 493 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…licability of the doctrine of administrative res judicata. See Coral Reef Nurseries Inc. v. Babcock Co., 410 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). But it is the opportunity to be heard, rather than an actual hearing, which is critical. Cf., Litt v. Jarson, 97 So. 2d 46 (Fla.Sd DCA 1957). In the present case appellants received formal notice that they might obtain a hearing upon their initial permit application by filing a timely request. Appellants were thereby afforded a fair opportunity for a hearing, and the co…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hay v. Lyman A. Salisbury and Ruth Salisbury, 92 Fla. 446 (Fla. 1926)
- Crute v. State, 109 So. 617 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926)
- Mattair v. Card, 19 Fla. 455 (Fla. 1882)