ST. JOHNS COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
T. H. MURPHY, APPELLEE
ST. JOHNS COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
T. H. MURPHY, APPELLEE
97 So. 2d 185
Florida Supreme Court (1957)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 160 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on authority of the rule announced in North Bay Village v. Blackwell, Fla.1956, 88 So. 2d 524.
THOMAS, Acting Chief Justice, and ROBERTS, THORNAL, O’CONNELL and DREW, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (76 total)
-
Royal Carraway v. Revell, 116 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 1959)…laced others in danger of grave injury and that under all of the circumstances he could be found guilty of a conscious indifference for the safety of others.’ ” From Farrey v. Bettendorf, Fla.1957, 96 So. 2d 889, 895. . McNulty v. Hurley, Fla.1957, 97 So. 2d 185, 187; City of Boca Raton v. Mattef, Fla.1956, 91 So. 2d 644, 648. . Byers v. Gunn, Fla.1955, 81 So. 2d 723, 725. . Pound, Outlines of Lectures on Jurisprudence (1928) pp. 60-71. As cited in Prosser on Torts, 16 (1941). . The character of negligen…
-
Wood v. Camp, 284 So. 2d 691 (Fla. 1973)…reviewed, reported at 265 So. 2d 730 (1973), which attributes to Lunney an erroneous principle beyond its holding.1 The extent of our holding in Lunney was to remove the former “economic benefit” or “mutual benefit” requirement of McNulty v. Hurley, 97 So. 2d 185 (Fla.1957), and prior holdings, which was the former basis to qualify as a “public invitee” entitled to the standard of “reasonable care” at the hands of the property owner. We adopted instead an “invitation test” as to public or business invitees.…1 / 2
-
Post v. Lunney, 261 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 1972)…vitee under either (1) the invitation test stated in Second Restatement of Torts, § 332, and the case of Smith v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Fla.App.1970, 232 So. 2d 195, or (2) under the economic benefit test promulgated in McNulty v. Hurley, Fla.1957, 97 So. 2d 185?” (Lunney v. Post, supra, at 510.) We have jurisdiction to review by certio-rari the decision of the District Court. Art. V, § 4(2), Fla.Const., F.S.A., Rule 4.5(c)(6), F.A.R., 32 F.S.A. The plaintiff-respondent in this case, Mrs. Bernice Lunney,…1 / 4
Previewing 3 of 76 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- N. BAY Vill. v. Blackwell, 88 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 1956)