GREG SUTTON, APPELLANT,
v.
OLGA CAPETANIDIS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This case concerns the validity of a release executed by the appellee. The appellate court found the issue controlled by a prior Supreme Court of Florida opinion and reversed the lower court's judgment.
The release executed by the appellee is invalid, as the issue is controlled by the Supreme Court of Florida's decision in De Witt v. Miami Transit Company.
“The main issue raised by this appeal is the validity of a release executed by the appellee.”
Identifies the central legal question of the case.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe appellee executed a release, the validity of which was the central issue on appeal. The specific facts leading to the execution of the release and…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
[*201] PER CURIAM.
The main issue raised by this appeal is the validity of a release executed by the appellee. The record in this cause has been carefully examined and arguments at the bar of this court have been considered. We feel that the issue raised in this case is controlled by the opinion of the Supreme Court of Florida in De Witt v. Miami Transit Company, Fla.1957, 95 So. 2d 898, and that upon said authority the cause should be reversed. No useful purpose would be served by delineation of the facts and law in this cause as the aforementioned opinion brings to date all the known authorities on this question. The judgment of the lower court is therefore reversed with directions to the lower court to enter judgment for the appellant.
Reversed with directions.
CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.