STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,

v.

LEE LOCKETT, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Bell v. Bell, 112 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959)
  …he forced sale with one-half of the proceeds going to the wife is not for the purpose of any. lump sum settlement as alimony. See Bezanilla v. Bezanilla, Fla.1953, 65 So. 2d 754; Reid v. Reid, Fla.1954, 68 So. 2d 821; Kilian v. Kilian, Fla.App.1957, 97 So. 2d 201. The chancellor’s findings fail to establish any special equitable right to the property in question in either party. See Heath v. Heath, 103 Fla. 1071, 138 So. 796, 82 A.L.R. 537; Eakin v. Eakin, Fla.1958, 99 So. 2d 854. It is error for the court,…
• Norwood K. Walton v. Walton, 290 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
  …689.15, Fla.Stat. One of the early departures from this firm rule was that a chancellor could award the husband’s interest in the jointly held marital home as lump sum alimony. Reid v. Reid, Fla. 1953, 68 So. 2d 821; Kilian v. Kilian, Fla.App.1957, 97 So. 2d 201; Bergh v. Bergh, supra; Harder v. Harder, Fla.App.1972, 264 So. 2d 476. The courts also recognized that the wife could secure the husband’s interest in jointly held property by proving a special equity. Heath v. Heath, 103 Fla. 1071, 138 So. 796; Pa…
• Harder v. Harder, 264 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
  …a.App.1969, 219 So. 2d 749; Webb v. Webb, Fla.App.1963, 156 So. 2d 698; Gonzalez v. Gonzalez, Fla.App.1963, 156 So. 2d 206; Bergh v. Bergh, Fla.App.1961, 127 So. 2d 481; Bailey v. Bailey, Fla.App.1961, 126 So. 2d 165; Kilian v. Kilian, Fla.App.1957, 97 So. 2d 201. The final judgment is affirmed except for that provision in the final judgment concerning the wife’s conveyance to the husband of all of her right, title and interest in and to all her remaining property which we reverse. Affirmed in part and rev…

Authorities Cited

• Gee v. State, 61 Fla. 22 (Fla. 1911)