JOSE E. LOPEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY AND FORD MIDWAY MALL, INC., APPELLEES
JOSE E. LOPEZ, APPELLANT,
FORD MOTOR COMPANY AND FORD MIDWAY MALL, INC., APPELLEES
970 So. 2d 365
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Austin v. Liquid Distribs., Inc., 928 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Long v. Swofford, 805 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Am. Univ. OF the Caribbean v. Tien, 26 So. 3d 56 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)…on to vacate or modify the ex parte injunction. The record demonstrates that there was no immediate or irreparable injury that would have resulted without the entry of the ex parte injunction. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.610(a)(1); Grand Condo. Ass’n v. Cohn, 970 So. 2d 365 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Secrecy and speed served no purpose as the funds were then under the control of the federal court-appointed receiver. Nor did Ming Tien’s motion or the trial court’s order denying AUC’s motion to vacate the injunction set out a…
Authorities Cited
- Caraballo v. State, 805 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
- Austin v. Liquid Distribs., Inc., 928 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)