CHAVIS R. ZEIGLER, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Harrison v. J.P.A. Enters., L.L.C., 51 So. 3d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
  …69 So. 2d 813, 814 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (dismissing appeal from order that disposed of cross-claim where “all of the parties involved in this case remain in the lawsuit to litigate the pending claims”). Cf., e.g., Andrew v. Shands at Lake Shore, Inc., 970 So. 2d 887, 889 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (finding jurisdiction where the lower tribunal’s “order disposes of the entire ease as to an individual party”); Behavioral Healthcare Options, Inc. v. Charter Behavioral Health Sys. of Tampa Bay, Inc., 727 So. 2d 1135, 1136…
• State v. Beach BLVD Auto., Inc., 139 So. 3d 380 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)
  …ss is limited to the four corners of the complaint and to any documents attached or incorporated thereto). A trial court’s order dismissing a complaint for failure to state a cause of action is reviewed de novo. Andrew v. Shands at Lake Shore, Inc., 970 So. 2d 887, 889 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). FDUTPA prohibits “[u]nfair methods of competition, unconscionable acts or practices, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce.” § 501.204(1), Fla. Stat. (2011). The term “trade or c…
• ALA v. Royce Chesser, 5 So. 3d 715 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
  …of Transp., 778 So. 2d 519, 522 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)). We are under the same obligation.4 Whether the complaint states a viable cause of ac tion is a question of law, a question we consider de novo on review. See Andrew v. Shands at Lake Shore, Inc., 970 So. 2d 887, 889 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). In count one, appellant claimed Mr. Chesser had been unjustly enriched by “receiving] the Deed prior to the foreclosure sale without paying the value thereof’ to appellant and sought damages, interest, costs and reasonable…