MICHAEL LEE COLE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2007-12-28
No. 2D06-4153
STRINGER, J., and THREADGILL, EDWARD F., Senior Judge, Concur.
971 So. 2d 187 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2007) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
ALTENBERND, Judge.

ALTENBERND, Judge.

Michael Lee Cole appeals his judgments and sentences for battery on a law enforcement officer, possession of burglary tools, petit theft, and two counts of burglary of a structure, claiming that he did not receive proper jail credit for time served. We affirm his judgments. Based on the State’s concession of error, we reverse his sentences, but only to the extent that the sentences award incorrect jail credit. On remand, the trial court should correct the sentence to provide 691 days’ jail credit.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

STRINGER, J., and THREADGILL, EDWARD F., Senior Judge, Concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • In the Interest of J.H. v. C.H. and N.H., 204 So. 3d 122 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
    …e child has yet to be abused.” N.H., 192 So. 3d at 595; see also Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., v. K.D., 88 So. 3d 977 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), superseded on other grounds by § 39.806(1)©, Fla. Stat. (2014); H.B. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 971 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). In determining whether a connection or nexus exists, the inquiry is whether DCF proved that there is a substantial risk of harm to the sibling stemming from the abuse of the child. K.D., 88 So. 3d at 984. To that end, courts must…
  • A.D. v. Dep't of Child. & Families (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)
    …deemed to be at substantial risk of imminent abuse or neglect based on a parent's abuse or neglect of their siblings; however, the evidence must demonstrate a nexus between the past abuse and any prospective abuse to another sibling.” In re J.E.B., 971 So. 2d 187, 189 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (citing C.M. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs. (In re C.M.), 844 So. 2d 765, 766 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)). Here, the Department argues that the Mother’s testimony that Z.D. and N.D. both needed medicine and Z.D.’s and N.D.’s st…
  • J. F. v. Dep't of Child. & Families & Statewide Guardian Ad Litem (Fla. 6th DCA 2024)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw