N.D.E., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
N.D.E., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
971 So. 2d 268
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In this juvenile delinquency appeal, we reverse and remand for further proceedings because the reasons given by the trial court for departing from the recommendation of the Department of Juvenile Justice that appellant be placed in a moderate-risk facility and, instead, ordering a high-risk placement failed to identify the characteristics of such a placement that would better meet appellant’s needs than would a moderate-risk placement and were in part unsupported by any evidence. See, e.g., R.T. v. State, 946 So. 2d 112, 113 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (citing cases); J.A.R. v. State, 923 So. 2d 604, 605 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
KAHN, WEBSTER, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Talbert John Wood v. Blunck, 152 So. 3d 693 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)…s increased will not necessarily justify modification of the award.” Galligher, 527 So. 2d at 860. A variety of factors must be considered. See id. The court’s ultimate decision is reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard. Leonard v. Leonard, 971 So. 2d 268, 266 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). Although courts have discretion in determining the amount of alimony to award, the comparison of a party’s expenses and income with the amount of alimony is an important consideration. See Rosecan v. Springer, 845 So. 2d 9…
Authorities Cited
- J.A.R. v. State, 923 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
- R.T. v. State, 946 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)