NANCY L. MULLIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
NANCY L. MULLIS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
971 So. 2d 983
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, without prejudice to appellant filing a new timely motion which complies with the rule. Appellant must show, among other things, how her alleged mental state affected her ability to communicate with counsel and aid in her own defense. The grounds for her motion must be stated with particularity. See Spera v. State, 971 So. 2d 754, 2007 WL 3196507 (Fla. Nov. 1, 2007).
SHAHOOD, C.J., WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ferrandino v. Riley, 236 So. 3d 493 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
-
Breanden Beneschott v. Toptal, LLC (Fla. 6th DCA 2025)…Depositions and Discovery Act (“UIDDA”), § 92.251, Fla. Stat. (2020), is a final order for purposes of our appellate jurisdiction under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(b)(1)(A). See Greenlight Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Union Am. Mortg., Inc., 971 So. 2d 983, 984 & n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). Florida law governs our review. Id. at 985; § 92.251(5), Fla. Stat. Because it was error for the trial court to deny Beneschott’s privilege claims without first conducting an in camera inspection of the disputed docume…
-
Breanden Beneschott v. Toptal, LLC (Fla. 6th DCA 2025)
Authorities Cited
- Spera v. State, 971 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 2007)