EMMA CARTA, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
EDGAR CARTA, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT

Fla. 3d DCA | 2007-10-31
Nos. 3D06-2521, 3D07-753
Before RAMIREZ, SUAREZ and ROTHENBERG, JJ.
972 So. 2d 893 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2007) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
SUAREZ, J.

SUAREZ, J.

In Case Number 3D06-2521, we affirm the trial court’s final judgment with respect to the Florida court’s jurisdiction over the persons and property of the parties. In Case Number 3D07-753, with respect to attorney’s fees, we reverse the decision of the trial court and remand with directions to comply with this Court’s June 14, 2005 Order, Case Number 3D04-3113, granting appellant Emma Carta’s motion for attorney’s fees and remanding to fix the amount.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Dooley & Mack Constructors, Inc. v. Buildtec Constr. Grp., Inc., 983 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)
    …Surety and Indemnity Co., as the prevailing party in the underlying action. While this appeal was pending, this Court reversed and remanded the final summary judgment in that action. Dooley & Mack Constructors, Inc. v. Developers Sur. & Indem. Co., 972 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Thus, Developers is no longer the prevailing party, and the award of attorney’s fees and costs to Developers must be reversed. Marty v. Bainter, 727 So. 2d 1124, 1125 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (“[A]n award of attorney’s fees and costs…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw