GEORGE BATTLES, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Kasischke v. State, 991 So. 2d 803 (Fla. 2008)
  …’l Ins. Co., 511 So. 2d 971, 974 (Fla.1987); Ivey v. Chicago Ins. Co., 410 So. 2d 494, 497 (Fla.1982). Each District Court of Appeal also uses staff analyses. See, e.g., B.B. v. P.J.M., 933 So. 2d 57, 65 n. 8 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Burke v. Esposito, 972 So. 2d 1024, 1027-28 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); State v. Calderon, 951 So. 2d 1031, 1033-34 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Sun Bank/S. Fla., N.A. v. Baker, 632 So. 2d 669, 671 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Childers v. Cape Canaveral Hosp., Inc., 898 So. 2d 973, 975-77 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)…
• Zarra v. Burke, 28 So. 3d 191 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
  …doubt there have been instances of abuse in the imposition of the statutorily authorized [reopening] fees that are the subject of this action.” In fact, there is at least one case in which the reopening fee was found improper. See Burke v. Esposito, 972 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (denying petition for certiorari review where the clerk had been ordered to refund a $50 reopening fee). Based on this history, one wonders why a public service office such as the clerk’s has not worked with reasonable dispatch to…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Suarez v. Coral Gables Imports, Inc. (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)
  …tutes (2020). The procedure is intended to “assist in the administrative management of the court system and to provide a measuring tool for judicial workloads,” by recording the quantity, duration, and type of case dispositions. Burke v. Esposito, 972 So. 2d 1024, 1028 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (Altenbernd, J., concurring). This compilation of data is regularly transmitted to the Florida Supreme Court to assist in “certification of need for additional judgeships.” See Summary Reporting System (SRS) Manual (2002)…