JOSEPH CARRUTHERS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOSEPH CARRUTHERS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
972 So. 2d 1035
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. In this appeal pursuant to An-ders,
Defendant’s pro se briefs raise issues of involuntary plea which were not preserved for appeal by his pro se rule 3.170(Z) motion to withdraw plea. This affirmance is without prejudice to his right to assert them in a timely and sufficient rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief.
SHAHOOD, C.J., GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur. . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Paola A. Alvarado-Fernandez v. Mazoff, 151 So. 3d 8 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)…rt’s denial of both a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and ineffective service of process is de novo. Robles-Martinez v. Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP, 88 So. 3d 177, 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Am. Express Ins. Servs. Europe Ltd. v. Duvall, 972 So. 2d 1035, 1038 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). Here, there are sufficient facts that appear from a consideration of the entire record to justify the applicability of sections 48.161 and 48.171. Robb, 319 So. 2d at 646. The record reflects that Plaintiff persistently se…
-
Reynolds Am., Inc. v. Gero, 56 So. 3d 117 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)….193, have held that the presence of a subsidiary corporation within Florida is not enough, without more, to subject a non-Florida parent corporation to long-arm jurisdiction within this state.”); see also Am. Exp. Ins. Servs. Europe Ltd. v. Duvall, 972 So. 2d 1035, 1039 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (noting that “[t]he corollary is also true-jurisdietion over a parent company does not, without more, confer jurisdiction over the subsidiary”). This same reasoning applies to sister subsidiaries, such as RJR and RGP. In sh…
-
Aspsoft, Inc. v. Webclay, 983 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)…ver the defendants. As to WebClay only, we agree.1 [*765] The standard of review is de novo whenever an appeal arises from the trial court’s decision on a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. American Exp. Ins. Services Europe Ltd. v. Duvall, 972 So. 2d 1035, 1038 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). Under the two-part jurisdictional analysis detailed by the Florida Supreme Court in Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthe-nais, 554 So. 2d 499 (Fla.1989), in order to determine whether personal jurisdiction over a non-resident def…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)