F.S., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Smith v. State, 987 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)
  …at any time within the two-year time limit as long as the trial court has not yet ruled on the merits of the motion. Gaskin v. State, 737 So. 2d 509, 517-18 (Fla.1999); Oxendine v. State, 824 So. 2d 1022, 1023 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Samuels v. State, 973 So. 2d 662, 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED. ORFINGER, TORPY, and COHEN, JJ., concur.…
• Cook v. State, 13 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
  …App. P. 9.020(h). Accordingly, the appellant had the right to supplement his [*1111] rule 3.850 motion because it was filed within the two-year time limit and before the trial court ruled on the merits of his rule 3.850 motion. See Samuels v. State, 973 So. 2d 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). REVERSED and REMANDED. ALLEN, VAN NORTWTCK, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.…
• Jaddier T. Sanchez v. State, 82 So. 3d 1044 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
  …the issues raised in the addendum/amendment as they were raised within the two year limitations period of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 8.850, and because the trial court had not yet ruled on the merits of the original motion. Samuels v. State, 973 So. 2d 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). We agree. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court to allow the filing of the addendum/amendment and for the trial court to consider it along with the originally filed motion for post-conviction relief. Revers…

Authorities Cited

• In the Interest of R.I. v. State, 561 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)