WILLIAM LUCKY, PETITIONER,
v.
TIMOTHY RYAN, DIRECTOR, ET AL., RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Notice And Opportunity To Be Heard cases and more on FLexlaw
ROTHENBERG, J.
Based upon the record before us, which does not include the transcript or a written order holding the husband in civil contempt, we grant the husband’s petition for writ of habeas corpus and order his immediate release, as it appears that the trial court failed to notify the husband that he would be facing an allegation of civil contempt. See generally Bresch v. Henderson, 761 So. 2d 449, 451 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (“While a person facing civil contempt sanctions is not entitled to the full panoply of due process rights afforded to a person facing indirect criminal contempt charges, he or she is nonetheless entitled to a proceeding that meets the fundamental fairness requirements of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Such fundamental fairness includes providing the alleged contemnor with adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard.”) (citations omitted).
Petition for writ of habeas corpus granted. This opinion shall take effect immediately and will not be delayed by the filing of any motion for rehearing or other post-decision motion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cap. ONE, N.A. v. Forbes, 34 So. 3d 209 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…v. Heart Inst. of Pott St. Lucie, Inc., 863 So. 2d 189, 193 (Fla.2003). The order on review does not necessarily cause irreparable harm by allowing discovery of what the Bank claims to be irrelevant materials. See Am. Home Assurance Co. v. Vreeland, 973 So. 2d 668, 671 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (citing First Paradee, Ltd. v. Jones, 828 So. 2d 483, 485 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)). Thus, certiorari jurisdiction is improper. We dismiss this portion of the Bank’s petition. Manuals Specified in Request 10 The Bank argues that…
-
Seminole Cas. Ins. Co. v. Mastrominas, 6 So. 3d 1256 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)…(Fla.1995). A trial court departs from the essential requirements of the law in compelling disclosure of the contents of an insurer’s claim file when the issue of coverage is in dispute and has not been resolved. See Am. Home Assur. Co. v. Vreeland, 973 So. 2d 668, 671 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. v. Hoy, 927 So. 2d 122, 126 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Gov’t Employees Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez, 960 So. 2d 794, 796 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Here, the Mastrominases alleged breach of contract and sought a declaratory…
-
McDONALD'S Rests. OF Fla., Inc. v. DOE, 87 So. 3d 791 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)…isclosure of trade secrets may cause irreparable injury that cannot be corrected on appeal; the disclosure lets the ‘cat out of the bag.’” Capital One, N.A. v. Forbes, 34 So. 3d 209, 212 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (citing Am. Home Assurance Co. v. Vreeland, 973 So. 2d 668, 671 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)). Indeed, Ms. Doe’s concession that many of the items were show pieces for trial suggests a fishing expedition. See Grooms v. Distinctive Cabinet Designs, Inc., 846 So. 2d 652, 655 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (reiterating “that rule a…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Bresch v. Cal Henderson, 761 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)