MICHELLE DEVIDO F/K/A MICHELLE CURRY, APPELLANT,
v.
RANDALL S. CURRY, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court cannot award appellate attorney's fees unless the appellate court issues a mandate authorizing it.
The trial court awarded the appellee appellate attorney's fees based on a property settlement agreement, despite the prior appeal being dismissed as u…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Appellate Procedure 9.400(B) cases and more on FLexlaw
DAMOORGIAN, J.
Appellant, Michelle Devido, appeals the trial court’s order awarding the appellee, Randall S. Curry, appellate attorney’s fees. We reverse because the trial court may not award appellate attorney’s fees absent a mandate from the appellate court. By way of background, Devido previously appealed this case. However, that appeal was dismissed as untimely. Curry never filed a motion seeking appellate attorney’s fees with this Court as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(b). Instead, Curry moved the trial court for appellate attorney’s fees, which the trial court granted. The trial court reasoned that it had the authority to award appellate attorney’s fees because the parties’ property settlement agreement provided for such an award. This appeal followed.
It is well settled that a “trial court may not award appellate attorney’s fees absent a mandate from the appellate court.” Real Estate Apartments, Ltd. v. Bayshore Garden Apartments, Ltd., 530 So. 2d 977, 979 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), Gieseke v. Gieseke, 499 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); (citing Mullins v. Mullins, 342 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Ludemann v. Ludemann, 317 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)).
Curry argues that once this Court dismissed the appeal, he had no choice but to seek his appellate fees from the trial court because this Court had no jurisdiction. However, an appellate court’s dismissal does not vest authority in the trial court to grant appellate fees. See Office of State Attorney v. Gonzalez, 953 So. 2d 759, 766 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (trial court lacks the authority to award appellate attorney’s fees where appellate court has dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction absent a mandate).
Consequently, the trial court erred in awarding appellate attorney’s fees.
Reversed.
KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sanchez v. State Farm Fla. Ins. Co., 997 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…rd of appellate attorney fees. Appellants provide no record support for the allegation. However, a trial court has no authority to grant appellate attorney fees absent a direction or award by this Court. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.400(b); Devido v. Curry, 973 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Thus, there should be no duplicate attorney fee awards in this case.…
Authorities Cited
- Ursel Ludemann v. Manfred Ludemann, 317 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)
- Gieseke v. Haydee Gieseke, 499 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
- Off. of the State Attorney for the Thirteenth Jud. Cir. of Fla. v. Gonzalez, 953 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)
- Real Est. Apts., Ltd. v. Bayshore Garden Apts., Ltd., 530 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)
- Mullins v. Mullins, 342 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)