FRANK VANCE
v.
STATE
FRANK VANCE
STATE
111 Fla. 582
Florida Supreme Court (1933)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 149 So. 574
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the *583judgment herein,-and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. •
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jacksonville Am. Publ'g Co. v. Jacksonville Paper Co., 143 Fla. 835 (Fla. 1940)…st be in writing and signed by the party to be charged, has no application where the new promise to pay was made before the statute of limitations had run. Welles-Kahn Co. v. Klein, 81 Fla. 524, 88 So. 315. See also Dickson v. Humpfer, 111 Fla. 481, 149 So. 574. A promise to pay or a part payment tolls the running of the statute of limitations, if made prior to the running of the statute. This rule is not derived from any statutory provision but from the decisions of the courts. 17 R. C. L., pp. 921, 889,…
-
Wester v. Mitchell Rigdon and his wife, 110 So. 2d 470 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959)…F.S.A. . F.S. §§ 674.07, 674.27 and 674.31, F.S.A. . F.S. § 676.47, F.S.A. . F.S. § 95.11(1), F.S.A. . F.S. § 95.11(3), F.S.A. . 98 Fla. 792, 124 So. 275, 276. . Syerson v. Kimball, Fla.1949, 40 So. 2d 781. . Dickson v. Humpfer, 111 Fla. 581, 149 So. 574; Vinson v. Palmer, 45 Fla. 630, 34 So. 276. . Hall v. Brown, 80 Fla. 481, 86 So. 277; Vinson v. Palmer, supra note 15.…