DENISE C. SHARON, PETITIONER,
v.
C. WILLIAM SHARON, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted petitioner's motion for summary relief, quashed the decision under review, and remanded for reconsideration.
The Second District Court of Appeal relied on its Nicoletti decision, which was later disapproved by the Florida Supreme Court in Montello. The Suprem…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Supreme Court Jurisdiction cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Sharon v. Sharon, 915 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), in which the Second District Court of Appeal cited as authority its decision in Nicoletti v. Nicoletti 902 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), disapproved by Montello v. Montello, 961 So. 2d 257 (Fla.2007), and review dismissed, No. SC05-949 (Fla. Oct.23, 2007). At the time that the Second District Court issued its decision in Sharon, its Nicoletti decision was pending review in this Court. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418 (Fla.1981).
We stayed the present case pending our disposition of Montello v. Montello, 961 So. 2d 257 (Fla.2007), in which we ultimately disapproved the Second District Nicolet-ti decision. Petitioner thereafter filed a motion for summary relief pursuant to our decision in Montello. Upon consideration of petitioner’s motion, respondent’s opposing response thereto, and the parties’ previously filed jurisdictional briefs, we hereby grant petitioner’s motion for summary relief.
We accordingly grant the petition for review in the present case. The decision under review is quashed, and this matter is remanded to the Second District for reconsideration upon application of this Court’s decision in Montello.
It is so ordered.
LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sharon v. Sharon, 35 So. 3d 962 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…t file a motion for attorneys' fees within the thirty-day window that this court applied prior to the supreme court's decision in Montello v. [*964] Montello, 961 So. 2d 257 (Fla.2007). See Sharon v. Sharon, 915 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), rev’d, 974 So. 2d 358 (Fla.2008), aff'd on remand, 978 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (table decision). . Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So. 2d 697, 700 (Fla.1997).…
Authorities Cited
- Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 1981)
- Nicoletti v. Nicoletti, 902 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
- Montello v. Montello, 961 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 2007)
- Sharon v. Sharon, 915 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)