AAA BAIL BONDSMAN SERVICE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2008-02-15
No. 5D07-2337
GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
974 So. 2d 554 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2008) Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court properly denied appellant’s motion to cancel a final judgment forfeiting a bail bond where the State did not interfere with appellant’s exclusive custody of the criminal defendant prior to the defendant absconding. See Universal Bail Bonds, Inc. v. State, 929 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Fast Release Bail Bonds, Inc. v. State, 895 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Bush v. Int’l Fid. Ins. Co., 834 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Michael FOX M.D. v. Dep't OF Health, 994 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)
    …r. See Home Ins. Co. v. C & G Sporting Goods, Inc., 453 So. 2d 121, 123 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). It is well-established that the ALJ was not required to believe Appellant’s testimony, even if unrebutted. See, e.g., City of Orlando Police Dep’t v. Rose, 974 So. 2d 554, 555 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008); Walker v. Dep’t of Bus. & Prof'l Regulation, 705 So. 2d 652, 654 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). However, the burden still rested with the Department to establish a violation of the standard of care by clear and convincing evidence. S…
  • Riley v. Lien, 13 So. 3d 1085 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)
    …imony regarding the extent of his income decline was substantially impeached, and the magistrate simply did not believe it. As the fact-finder, a magistrate can reject testimony that he or she disbelieves. E.g., City of Orlando Police Dept. v. Rose, 974 So. 2d 554, 554 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (“The finder of fact is not required to believe the testimony of any witness ....”) (citations omitted). Having rejected Riley’s testimony on this point, the magistrate properly set the child support payments based upon the'…
  • Stanley v. Bank OF Am., N.A., 199 So. 3d 409 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)
    …loan. Q. So counsel had mentioned some $6,700 figure that was paid? A. Yes. Q. Was that incorrect? A. That was incorrect. As the fact-finder, a magistrate may. reject testimony that he or she disbelieves. E.g,, City of Orlando Police Dep’t v. Rose, 974 So. 2d 554, 555 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (“The finder of fact is not required to believe the testimony of any -witness, even if unrebutted.”). However, there is a significant difference between merely finding a party’s position to be unpersuasive and misapprehendin…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw