HUGO L. BLACK, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
FRANK JACOBS, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
HUGO L. BLACK, JR., APPELLANT,
FRANK JACOBS, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
974 So. 2d 1172
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See § 194.171(2), (6), Fla. Stat. (2005).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Recardo Clayton v. State, 34 So. 3d 214 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)…denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(a). We affirm because the motion is successive. Clayton was convicted and sentenced after a jury trial on July 7, 2006, which was affirmed on February 20, 2008. See Clayton v. State, 974 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). Clayton then filed a post-conviction relief motion, which was considered on May 20, 2008, and denied without an evidentiary hearing. Clayton appealed and on November 5, 2008, we issued our opinion, affirming. See Clayton v. State…
-
Recardo Clayton v. State, 176 So. 3d 303 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)…ed the employee with a gun. Clayton was apprehended and charged with armed robbery. In June of 2006, a jury convicted Clayton of the lesser offense of robbery without the use of a firearm. This Court affirmed the final judgment in Clayton v. State, 974 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). Subsequently, Clayton has filed eight petitions or motions for post-conviction relief, including the current petition.1 As [*304] early as 2010, we observed that several claims in Clayton’s underlying 3.850 motion were “successi…1 / 2